Comments

• Schine

  January 29, 2010, 07:18:24 pm

  
  

  Chief Petty Officer

  
  

  Reputation: 9

  

  
  

  

  4 hards, 3 magstabs, 1 rep that doesn't suck (Such as Imperial Navy) and a tracking computer over the tracking link.
• sabre906

  January 29, 2010, 09:31:07 pm

  
  

  Ensign

  
  

  Reputation: 12

  

  
  

  

  I wouldn't think the 3rd magstab is worth it, if you have to take off a rep. It cuts down tanking by quite a bit.
• Schine

  January 30, 2010, 01:38:24 am

  
  

  Chief Petty Officer

  
  

  Reputation: 9

  

  
  

  

  it's over-tanked as is and Fed Navy reps are basically t2 with better fitting reqs.
• Mike712

  January 30, 2010, 01:56:59 am

  
  

  Commodore

  
  

  Reputation: 739

  

  
  

  

  Use only 1 rep, fit 3 faction mag stabs, use 450mm rails.
  
  [Megathron Navy Issue, PvE]
  Imperial Navy Armor Kinetic Hardener
  Imperial Navy Armor Kinetic Hardener
  Imperial Navy Armor Thermic Hardener
  Imperial Navy Armor Thermic Hardener
  Imperial Navy Large Armor Repairer
  Federation Navy Magnetic Field Stabilizer
  Federation Navy Magnetic Field Stabilizer
  Federation Navy Magnetic Field Stabilizer
  
  Federation Navy Tracking Computer, Optimal Range
  Cap Recharger II
  Cap Recharger II
  Cap Recharger II
  
  425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L
  425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L
  425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L
  425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L
  425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L
  425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L
  425mm Railgun II, Antimatter Charge L
  Drone Link Augmentor I
  
  Large Capacitor Control Circuit I
  Large Capacitor Control Circuit I
  Large Capacitor Control Circuit I
  
  
  Garde II x5
  Hobgoblin II x5
  Warrior II x5
  
  
  
  This setup does 884 DPS at 30km.
  
  Use implants 'Squire' CC8 and CR8, 'Noble' ZET4000, 'Gunslinger' AX2 and 'Deadeye' ZGL1000.
  
  
• SoHxNyx

  January 30, 2010, 07:23:24 am

  
  

  Petty Officer 3rd. Class

  
  

  Reputation: 1

  

  
  

  

  nah im not changeing what i feel comfortable flying i like haveing the dual reps id rather have a over tanked ship then a undertanked ship this fit i use mostly on enemes abound and for that mission its best to be over tanked then undertanked.
• Asday

  January 30, 2010, 08:34:39 am

  
  

  Ensign

  
  

  Reputation: 11

  

  
  

  

  Or you could, you know, drop a rep for DPS, and do more damage, so you kill the wave before the next one spawns.
  
  Also, (though I'm guilty of this), don't post a fit if you're not willing to make it better.  -1.
• SoHxNyx

  January 30, 2010, 05:42:46 pm

  
  

  Petty Officer 3rd. Class

  
  

  Reputation: 1

  

  
  

  

  Quote from: Asday on January 30, 2010, 08:34:39 am

  Or you could, you know, drop a rep for DPS, and do more damage, so you kill the wave before the next one spawns.
  
  Also, (though I'm guilty of this), don't post a fit if you're not willing to make it better. -1.
  

  
  lmao whats the point of playing eve if every loadout has to be the same with two magstabs i put out enough dps as it is and can do a level 4 faster then a missile boat can with only two magstabs..
  
  Those of you who think fits should be the same should wake up and take a big breath of fresh reality that not everyone is the same.. other, people fit  their ships that they bought with isk they made how they want to fit them.,
  
  this site is inteded for those to create and share their loadouts a navy meg with two magstabs works fine for me if i want more dps ill put a 3rd on but i prefer a better over tank then a undertank in eneimies abound.
• Schine

  January 30, 2010, 07:01:11 pm

  
  

  Chief Petty Officer

  
  

  Reputation: 9

  

  
  

  

  Shame those reps are t2 in all but fitting req, so I'm -1ing anyway.
• Asday

  January 30, 2010, 07:33:22 pm

  
  

  Ensign

  
  

  Reputation: 11

  

  
  

  

  Yeah, let's do missions inefficiently!  HOW REFRESHING.
  
  This is a site that people come to, to see how to fit ships well.  It's all good and well you posting yourfit, but if it's not good, and people give suggestions, take them on board.  This isn't facebook:  O LOL HAI GAIZ, HERE'S 20 IDENTICAL PICTURES OF ME.
• SoHxNyx

  January 30, 2010, 07:53:41 pm

  
  

  Petty Officer 3rd. Class

  
  

  Reputation: 1

  

  
  

  

  Quote from: Asday on January 30, 2010, 07:33:22 pm

  Yeah, let's do missions inefficiently! HOW REFRESHING.
  
  This is a site that people come to, to see how to fit ships well. It's all good and well you posting yourfit, but if it's not good, and people give suggestions, take them on board. This isn't facebook: O LOL HAI GAIZ, HERE'S 20 IDENTICAL PICTURES OF ME.
  

  
  What is facebook ?
• Asday

  January 30, 2010, 08:29:39 pm

  
  

  Ensign

  
  

  Reputation: 11

  

  
  

  

  Where people say "O LOL HAI GAIZ" and post 20 identical pictures of themselves?
• SoHxNyx

  January 30, 2010, 08:38:15 pm

  
  

  Petty Officer 3rd. Class

  
  

  Reputation: 1

  

  
  

  

  Quote from: Asday on January 30, 2010, 08:29:39 pm

  Where people say "O LOL HAI GAIZ" and post 20 identical pictures of themselves?
  

  
  neverheard of it ....
• Grymmstrike

  February 02, 2010, 05:52:17 am

  
  

  Crewman Novice

  
  

  Reputation: 0

  

  
  

  

  Asday, you are an arrogant fool who really doesn't have an educated opinion on this.  Just because you want to risk a ship to put more damage on it doesn't mean everyone else should.  Two reps isn't the end of the world, and in some cases it would help survival chances.  While this isn't my specific setup (I only use one rep myself, it is an Imp Navy rep, so does a lot more than the Fed Navy/T2) it is a viable setup and depending on your comfort level, it isn't a bad setup.  You are the same idiot who was raving about how awesome that silly Mach setup with 400dps tank was for L4 missions.  Sure, you can generally pick off a group and tank them, but sometimes you can't get just one group, and 400dps tank isn't going to keep you alive.
• Asday

  February 05, 2010, 07:28:24 am

  
  

  Ensign

  
  

  Reputation: 11

  

  
  

  

  Quote from: Grymmstrike on February 02, 2010, 05:52:17 am

  Asday, you are an arrogant fool who really doesn't have an educated opinion on this.  Just because you want to risk a ship to put more damage on it doesn't mean everyone else should.  Two reps isn't the end of the world, and in some cases it would help survival chances.  AND THIS IS WHERE I STOPPED READING.
  

  Yes, I'm sure I haven't the experience running :censored: ing missions to tell people about it.  Let's next tell Shakespeare he's a shit plagiarist, and will never become known outside of Shropshire.
  
  Secondly, :censored: you.
  
  Thirdly, a great way to improve survival chances is to not be a dumb mother :censored: er, and learn how to run missions.  In the case of EA, kill hard and fast, and there's no need to tank.  In AE IV, kill hard and fast, watch triggers, and there's no need to tank.  In Rogue Drone Harassment, kill hard and fast, watch the triggers, and there's no need to tank.  NOTICE A PATTERN?  HURFDURF.
  
  Also, I have a MAJOR :censored: ing problem with your use of the term "risk".  Infact, I have an aversion to the word being anywhere in the vicinity of a mission running ship.  Mission running is, and you might want to write this down, 'cause it's a :censored: ing biggy, mission running is safe.  Dropping a rep to increase DPS has NO :censored: ING EFFECT on risk, so long as tank remains above 400.  Infact, it skews risk/reward, by increasing reward over time, making missions, and here's another thing to write down, making missions efficient.
  
  Why you would ever want to spend more time :censored: ing about in missions than is absolutely necessary is beyond me completely.
  
  Though, I suppose your right.  I am arrogant.  Because I am better than you.  Perhaps one day I should emulate your mind, and think on a lesser level.  Mind you, that might make me play WoW.