Loadout: IF god forbid i acctually used a drake
IF god forbid i acctually used a drake
Builder
Quick tagSimilar
|
Ship fitting - Built on May 10, 2009
There are no revisions on file for this loadout. Only the original builder may revise the loadout.
Positive ratings (28)
Negative ratings (3)
Stats assume all skills at V. Use EVEHQ for detailed combat simulations.
This feature is currently in Beta.
How to fund this loadout with PLEX:
*You may only sell PLEX for ISK via the CCP Secure Transfer Method You need to upgrade your Flash Player
If i was going to fly a drake I think this is what i would fly. This fitting would just be something to fly as a change of playstyle from my CNR/Golem.
I used heavy assault missiles because because i don't think i could justify flying a drake with the dps of heavy missiles when i have other options. Since I'm using heavy assault missiles to mission, going with a AB is a must and if i'm using that then i can't go passive, so i went with the active tank. Yeah it is a bit on the pricy side, but the mods are coming right off my CNR so that is ok. I fully believe that while missioning 4 BCU's even with the diminishing returns are a must if you can pull it off. Please don't blast me cause this is a drake, this is just a change of pace fit for me. Something i might take out to kill some serps since they are weak to kinetic.
Attachments
Drake - New Setup 1.jpg (123.52 kB - downloaded 1,880 times.) Drake - New Setup 1.jpg (121.08 kB - downloaded 345 times.) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19
0
0
0
57.87%
78.93%
74.72%
66.3%
Comments
-
May 10, 2009, 04:59:05 am
Lieutenant
Reputation: 56
But with all these faction mods, are you sure you can not get an Amrr Navy NOS on there? The extra range is handy
.
EDIT: a Faction Afterburner is also a good thing, I would check that out.
The main reason i did not put them on is that i don't currently own them. If however i feel like this needs some more speed i will prolly end up buying one anyway.
Your right the extra range on the nos would be nice. This too i might get if i have trouble finding things to nos while using this.
Thanks for the suggestions, they are both good. -
May 10, 2009, 05:11:03 am
Member
Reputation: 0
I'll give it
because i use the same set up.
-
May 10, 2009, 07:41:45 am
Lieutenant, Junior Grade
Reputation: 6
I think there is no excuse for not having a Republic Fleet AB on this ship. Fleet propulsion mods are equal to Domination (best faction mods you can get). So throw a Fleet 10mn AB on there. -
May 10, 2009, 08:00:37 am
Senior Chief Petty Officer
Reputation: 2
But with all these faction mods, are you sure you can not get an Amrr Navy NOS on there? The extra range is handy.
EDIT: a Faction Afterburner is also a good thing, I would check that out.
The main reason i did not put them on is that i don't currently own them. If however i feel like this needs some more speed i will prolly end up buying one anyway.
Your right the extra range on the nos would be nice. This too i might get if i have trouble finding things to nos while using this.
Thanks for the suggestions, they are both good.
I factor the extra speed in the same way I do the BCU's every littel edge makes the misison go faster and moe effective. as well as saving cap for the faction burners. The faction NOSes are cheap tho, but may not be strictly be needed if tank is sufficient.
-
May 10, 2009, 08:11:32 am
Senior Chief Petty OfficerReputation: 46
Why does putting an AB stop you from going passive? -
May 10, 2009, 08:58:58 am
LieutenantReputation: 56
Since it looks like the faction AB is gonna be a little more important i'll go ahead and buy one, i changed to the loadout to include it and put up a second pic with the loadout.Why does putting an AB stop you from going passive?
Between having 2-3 active hardeners, an AB and a TP that is a lot more cap use than a typical passive setup can handle. Most passive setups won't let you use more than 6 cap/sec this one would use closer to 10.
Plus going active let me use 4 BCU's which is nice for mission completion times. -
May 10, 2009, 09:04:51 am
Senior Chief Petty OfficerReputation: 46
OK
-
June 18, 2009, 08:21:52 pm
MemberReputation: 0
Assaults? LOL What are you doing, PVP & lvl 3s? -
June 18, 2009, 08:34:32 pm
LieutenantReputation: 56
Assaults? LOL What are you doing, PVP & lvl 3s?
Did you read my op? I talk about this choice there. -
October 16, 2009, 05:51:09 pm
Member 2nd Class
Reputation: 0
id change one of the invulns for a extender -
October 17, 2009, 03:46:05 am
LieutenantReputation: 56
id change one of the invulns for a extender
lol, just lol
extenders have no place in pve unless you are running a passive tank, since this is an active tank all it would due is increase my sig radius and lower my tank. -
April 26, 2010, 09:22:17 am
Member 5th Class
Reputation: 0
Three words: use a Tengu. -
April 26, 2010, 09:38:26 am
Senior Chief Petty OfficerReputation: 56
Oh look another Dra...
Oh, well...
Good fit!
Don't necropost. -
April 26, 2010, 11:59:24 am
LieutenantReputation: 56
Three words: use a Tengu.
That is a genius comment considering this loadout was made way before the Tengu was implemented into the game. -
April 26, 2010, 12:03:42 pm
Rear Admiral
Reputation: 495
Do you fit anything without an A-type med booster and CN invulns? didn't think so. -
April 26, 2010, 01:14:37 pm
LieutenantReputation: 56
Do you fit anything without an A-type med booster and CN invulns? didn't think so.
I don't because it gives a tank good enough to do any mission pve stuff for the least amount of cap, therefor giving you more slots for gank. -
April 26, 2010, 01:27:56 pm
Commander
Reputation: 121
How bout just use a NM. See that's real constructive.
Really these trolls should just look a a fit for what it is and does.
Not what other ships are and do.
Stupid troll is stupid.
I post a active drake yest. very similar to this one. Not knowing about it.
Only difference is that I used range rigs and a better tp and sba.
Fighting angels which is the main rat you go up against over there in Matar space that's fine. I run AE with 2x inv. and med. pithum on Mach it's a joke. hardly ever rep like some missions that I use tachs on NM and blast the shit out of the rats(sanshas) at 50km+.Do you fit anything without an A-type med booster and CN invulns? didn't think so.
I don't because it gives a tank good enough to do any mission pve stuff for the least amount of cap, therefor giving you more slots for gank.
But, w/o being very careful. Which I hate doing. Med. pith not the best choice even when being careful vrs. many amarr missions for max gank as using a med. sb you need 3x specific hards and 2x sba to tank the mish.
-
April 26, 2010, 01:55:36 pm
Commodore
Reputation: 483
fits almost a year old guys, epic necro -
January 17, 2011, 06:25:23 pm
CommanderReputation: 45
almost equally epic necro!!! -
January 17, 2011, 06:37:28 pm
Senior Chief Petty OfficerReputation: 56
I think intentional necroposting should be a bannable offense. -
January 17, 2011, 07:46:56 pm
CommanderReputation: 121
I think intentional necroposting should be a bannable offense.
or just lock all the old shit -
January 17, 2011, 09:35:48 pm
Rear Admiral
Reputation: 1001
I think intentional necroposting should be a bannable offense.
or just lock all the old shit
I may have suggested that and the idea may have already been turned down... >.>
We don't like necro posts, but they're not a bannable offense. If necro's should be bannable, so should those calling it a necro, just saying.
And certainly don't report necro posts, for the love of my inbox.
I agree of 4 BCU. Faster mission = more isk.
But with all these faction mods, are you sure you can not get an Amrr Navy NOS on there? The extra range is handy
EDIT: a Faction Afterburner is also a good thing, I would check that out.